<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Working Hard So You Don&#8217;t Have To</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.baltimoremick.com/blog/2006/06/20/working-hard-so-you-dont-have-to/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.baltimoremick.com/blog/2006/06/20/working-hard-so-you-dont-have-to/</link>
	<description>Jason J. Thomas&#039; Weblog: Now with more cowbell!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:18:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Teare</title>
		<link>http://www.baltimoremick.com/blog/2006/06/20/working-hard-so-you-dont-have-to/comment-page-1/#comment-1597</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Teare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 19:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baltimoremick.com/blog/2006/06/20/working-hard-so-you-dont-have-to/#comment-1597</guid>
		<description>Re: Password Management with Keepass, I agree that it is 1000 times better than a sticky note; however, it doesn&#039;t go far enough IMO.

I much prefer a Password Manager that integrates directly with the browser, like RoboForm for Windows or 1Passwd for Mac OS X.  I spend most my day browsing the net and I couldn&#039;t live without these tools.

Both these tools go well beyond KeyPass&#039; features, see the &lt;a href=&quot;http://1passwd.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;1Passwd Mac OS X Password Manager&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://roboform.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Roboform Form Filler&lt;/a&gt; homepages for more details.

One thing I do love about KeePass, however, is that it has an open source implementation of the encryption algorithm.  Sadly RoboForm uses its own proprietary solution.  1Passwd, otoh, uses the standard OS X keychain so you can rest assured that a whole team of Apple engineers have made it robust and secure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Password Management with Keepass, I agree that it is 1000 times better than a sticky note; however, it doesn&#8217;t go far enough IMO.</p>
<p>I much prefer a Password Manager that integrates directly with the browser, like RoboForm for Windows or 1Passwd for Mac OS X.  I spend most my day browsing the net and I couldn&#8217;t live without these tools.</p>
<p>Both these tools go well beyond KeyPass&#8217; features, see the <a href="http://1passwd.com/" rel="nofollow">1Passwd Mac OS X Password Manager</a> and <a href="http://roboform.com" rel="nofollow">Roboform Form Filler</a> homepages for more details.</p>
<p>One thing I do love about KeePass, however, is that it has an open source implementation of the encryption algorithm.  Sadly RoboForm uses its own proprietary solution.  1Passwd, otoh, uses the standard OS X keychain so you can rest assured that a whole team of Apple engineers have made it robust and secure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Overton</title>
		<link>http://www.baltimoremick.com/blog/2006/06/20/working-hard-so-you-dont-have-to/comment-page-1/#comment-1566</link>
		<dc:creator>David Overton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2006 00:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baltimoremick.com/blog/2006/06/20/working-hard-so-you-dont-have-to/#comment-1566</guid>
		<description>Call me silly, why go load an outlook clone when the Exchange CAL, which you HAVE TO BUY to legally use Exchange, gives you the right to use Outlook?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call me silly, why go load an outlook clone when the Exchange CAL, which you HAVE TO BUY to legally use Exchange, gives you the right to use Outlook?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason J. Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.baltimoremick.com/blog/2006/06/20/working-hard-so-you-dont-have-to/comment-page-1/#comment-1550</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason J. Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 11:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baltimoremick.com/blog/2006/06/20/working-hard-so-you-dont-have-to/#comment-1550</guid>
		<description>I like the easier way to create a PDF cheaply: PDFCreator.  As for Foxit, it is quite nice.  Quick, easy, and reading a PDF in no time whatsoever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the easier way to create a PDF cheaply: PDFCreator.  As for Foxit, it is quite nice.  Quick, easy, and reading a PDF in no time whatsoever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mokiejovis</title>
		<link>http://www.baltimoremick.com/blog/2006/06/20/working-hard-so-you-dont-have-to/comment-page-1/#comment-1548</link>
		<dc:creator>mokiejovis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baltimoremick.com/blog/2006/06/20/working-hard-so-you-dont-have-to/#comment-1548</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the heads up on Foxit Reader - I&#039;ve been more and more irritated with Adobe Reader for some time now. Loading Adobe Acrobat is fine when I want to MAKE a pdf, but just reading one seems to take forever. Foxit is fantastic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the heads up on Foxit Reader &#8211; I&#8217;ve been more and more irritated with Adobe Reader for some time now. Loading Adobe Acrobat is fine when I want to MAKE a pdf, but just reading one seems to take forever. Foxit is fantastic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

